<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Risk and Safety Blog</title>
	<link>http://risk-safety.com</link>
	<description>Safety, Security, Reliability</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Use of RFID in Process Safety: Track Hazardous Chemicals and Track Personnel</title>
		<link>http://risk-safety.com/use-of-rfid-in-process-safety-track-hazardous-chemicals-and-track-personnel/</link>
		<comments>http://risk-safety.com/use-of-rfid-in-process-safety-track-hazardous-chemicals-and-track-personnel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Saraf</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Response Plan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Process Safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[emergency response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[employee tracking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hazardous cehmicals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[RFID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://risk-safety.com/use-of-rfid-in-process-safety-track-hazardous-chemicals-and-track-personnel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RFID stands for Radio-Frequency IDentification. It is a small electronic device that consist of a chip (capable of carrying 2000 bytes of data) and an antenna.
A RFID device provides a unique identifier and serves the same purpose as a bar code on a consumer product or a magnetic strip on the back of a credit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RFID stands for <u><strong>R</strong></u>adio-<u><strong>F</strong></u>requency <u><strong>ID</strong></u>entification. It is a small electronic device that consist of a chip (capable of carrying 2000 bytes of data) and an antenna.</p>
<p>A RFID device provides a unique identifier and serves the same purpose as a bar code on a consumer product or a magnetic strip on the back of a credit card.</p>
<p>I would like to highlight two uses of RFID technology for process safety applications.</p>
<p><strong>Tracking of Hazardous Chemicals</strong></p>
<p>BASF plans to use RFID to monitor the location and condition of its fleet of rail cars containing hazardous chemicals. The RFID system system not only provides location of the cargo but also sends alerts to authorized users in the event of incidents such as a rail car collision, an unacceptable temperature fluctuation or tampering with rail car. (<a href="http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/view/7255">Read More</a>)</p>
<p><strong>Tracking of Personnel During An Emergency </strong></p>
<p>During an emergency evacuation, it is vital to account for plant personnel. Typically this task is performed by designated plant employees but BP&#8217;s Cherry Point facility is using RFID for tracking personnel. The RFID tracking system will be used to ascertain the whereabouts of staff members, contractors and visitors. (<a href="http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/2389/1/1/">Read More</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://risk-safety.com/use-of-rfid-in-process-safety-track-hazardous-chemicals-and-track-personnel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Safety Training Helpful?</title>
		<link>http://risk-safety.com/is-safety-training-helpful/</link>
		<comments>http://risk-safety.com/is-safety-training-helpful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Saraf</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Process Safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ecourses]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NIOSH]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Occupational and health safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[safety training]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[worker safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[workplace safety training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://risk-safety.com/is-safety-training-helpful/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Workplace Safety training is a big industry&#8230;every year companies are spending millions of dollars on training their employees.
I have always doubted the efficacy of repetitive and boring training sessions whether personal or virtual (Will your Refresher Training Work?). What is more surprising is that organizations are increasing their training budget without evaluating efficacy of their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Workplace Safety training is a big industry&#8230;every year companies are spending millions of dollars on training their employees.</p>
<p>I have always doubted the efficacy of repetitive and boring training sessions whether personal or virtual (<a href="http://risk-safety.com/will-your-refresher-training-work/" title="Will Your Refresher Training Work" target="_blank">Will your Refresher Training Work?</a>). What is more surprising is that organizations are increasing their training budget without evaluating efficacy of their training program.</p>
<p>NIOSH recently a report regarding Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) training supporting this view (<a href="http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/Training/sys_review_education_training_2010.html" title="NIOSH Report" target="_blank">A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Training &amp; Education for the Protection of Workers</a>).</p>
<p>I would like to highlight one of the key conclusions regarding engagement during training sessions.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;There is insufficient evidence to determine whether a single session of high engagement training has a greater impact compared to a single session of low/medium engagement training.&#8221; </em></p>
<p>We all agree dull training sessions will never create the desired impact&#8230;but a great training session may not sufficient either. This is especially true for workplace safety training which often is intended to modify behavior/habits and is more than merely a knowledge imparting exercise.</p>
<p>You need to have regular follow up mechanisms in order to get to the desired results.</p>
<p>For the benefit of other readers, please share strategies you are currently using to increase safety training effectiveness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://risk-safety.com/is-safety-training-helpful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exploding Concrete</title>
		<link>http://risk-safety.com/exploding-concrete/</link>
		<comments>http://risk-safety.com/exploding-concrete/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Saraf</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Fires and explosions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Incident Investigation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reactive Chemicals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Accidents at Work]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[building sites]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Concrete]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[construction and demolition]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[explosions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health and Safety Executive]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://risk-safety.com/exploding-concrete/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently came across a very interesting incident involving foam concrete.
Foam concrete is produced by mechanical mixing of foam prepared in advance with concrete mixture, and not with the help of chemical reactions. At the incident site, two workers were removing steelwork using angle grinders while the foam concrete was settling. There was an explosion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently came across a very interesting <a href="http://www.camplaw.co.uk/blog/foamed-concrete-accident-at-work-construction-workers" target="_blank">incident involving foam concrete</a>.</p>
<p>Foam concrete is produced by mechanical mixing of foam prepared in advance with concrete mixture, and not with the help of chemical reactions. At the incident site, two workers were removing steelwork using angle grinders while the foam concrete was settling. There was an explosion injuring the two workers.</p>
<p>Foam concrete produces hydrogen which is highly flammable.</p>
<p>To know more about foam concrete hazards, click on the link below.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnbullas/3962266336/sizes/l/#cc_license" target="_blank">Health and Safety Alert on Foam Concrete Fire Hazards </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://risk-safety.com/exploding-concrete/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OSHA Combustible Dust Rulemaking</title>
		<link>http://risk-safety.com/osha-combustible-dust-rulemaking/</link>
		<comments>http://risk-safety.com/osha-combustible-dust-rulemaking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Saraf</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Dust Explosions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[OSHA PSM]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[aerosol explosion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[combustible dust]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dust explosion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dust fire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://risk-safety.com/osha-combustible-dust-rulemaking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stakeholder Comments on OSHA Combustible Rulemaking from John Astad&#8217;s blog.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dustexplosions.blogspot.com/2010/01/stakeholder-comments-osha-combustible.html" target="_blank">Stakeholder Comments on OSHA Combustible Rulemaking</a> from John Astad&#8217;s blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://risk-safety.com/osha-combustible-dust-rulemaking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biodiesel Incidents Trend</title>
		<link>http://risk-safety.com/biodiesel-incidents-trend/</link>
		<comments>http://risk-safety.com/biodiesel-incidents-trend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Saraf</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Incident Investigation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Process Safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biodiesel accident]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biodiesel fire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biodiesel fire and explosion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biodiesel PSM]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biodiesel safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biofuel accident]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biofuel safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://risk-safety.com/biodiesel-incidents-trend/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Based on incident data in biodiesel facilities, I had written that the biodiesel industry in the US is experiencing an incident every two-and-a-half months, i.e. approx. 10 weeks.
Here are incidents following my May 2009 blog post on biodiesel incident frequency.
1.       15 July 2009, Chicago: An explosion at a biodiesel plant in Chicago injuring two workers.
9-weeks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on incident data in biodiesel facilities, I had written that the <a href="http://risk-safety.com/fires-and-explosions-in-biodiesel-and-ethanol-facilities/" target="_blank" title="Fires and Explosion in Biodiesel and Bioethanol Industry">biodiesel industry in the US is experiencing an incident</a> every two-and-a-half months, i.e. approx. 10 weeks.</p>
<p>Here are incidents following my May 2009 blog post on biodiesel incident frequency.</p>
<p>1.       <a href="http://risk-safety.com/explosion-at-biodiesel-plant-july-2009/" target="_blank">15 July 2009, Chicago</a>: An explosion at a biodiesel plant in Chicago injuring two workers.</p>
<p><font color="#ff6600"><strong>9-weeks later&#8230; </strong></font></p>
<p>2.       <a href="http://risk-safety.com/florida-biodiesel-fire-the-trend-continues/" target="_blank">24 September, 2009, Florida</a>: a fire was reported in a biodisel plant near Osceola County in Florida. There were no fatalities or injuries.</p>
<p><font color="#ff6600"><strong>10-weeks later&#8230;</strong></font></p>
<p>3.       <a href="http://www.nwinnovation.com/imperium_shuts_biodiesel_plant_after_accident/s-0025575.html" target="_blank">4 December, 2009, Seattle</a>: A glycerin tank was over pressurized leading to equipment damage at Imperium Renewables&#8217; biodiesel plant in Seattle.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it high time for biofuel industry <a href="http://risk-safety.com/biofuel-safety-is-it-time-for-bio-psm/" target="_blank" title="Biofuel Safety: Is it Time for Bio-PSM?">to wake up</a> to these incidents?</p>
<p>In the coming year biodiesel production is expected to reduce due to (a) reduced oil prices and (b) expiration of $1 credit for every gallon. With reduced production, I expect reduction in incidents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://risk-safety.com/biodiesel-incidents-trend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Near-Miss(es)!!!</title>
		<link>http://risk-safety.com/near-misses/</link>
		<comments>http://risk-safety.com/near-misses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 05:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Saraf</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical Accidents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Human Factors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Risk Analysis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[accident investigation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[double jeopardy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[near miss]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[video near miss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://risk-safety.com/near-misses/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A friend of mine, Dr. Ben Thomas, recently forwarded me a video showing a man escaping incident in matter of seconds.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rapvHU3aoCw
Note: The video is probably not real as indicated by comments below it but if it is the person in the video is indeed very very lucky.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine, Dr. Ben Thomas, recently forwarded me a video showing a man escaping incident in matter of seconds.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rapvHU3aoCw"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rapvHU3aoCw">www.youtube.com/watch?v=rapvHU3aoCw</a></a></p>
<p><u>Note</u>: The video is probably not real as indicated by comments below it but if it is the person in the video is indeed very very lucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://risk-safety.com/near-misses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Workplace Safety Merely Common Sense?</title>
		<link>http://risk-safety.com/is-workplace-safety-merely-common-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://risk-safety.com/is-workplace-safety-merely-common-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Saraf</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Process Safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Risk Analysis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[health safety and environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[HSE accidents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[HSE incidents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[incident prevention]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[process safety accidents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[safety and risk management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[workplace safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://risk-safety.com/is-workplace-safety-merely-common-sense/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surprisingly, many organization and professionals believe that safety can be achieved by common sense. Here is an excellent article from Kevin Jones&#8217; Safety at Work blog about common sense and safety:
Safety is More Than Common Sense 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprisingly, many organization and professionals believe that safety can be achieved by common sense. Here is an excellent article from Kevin Jones&#8217; <u>Safety at Work</u> blog about common sense and safety:</p>
<p><a href="http://safetyatworkblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/30/safety-is-more-than-common-sense/#comments" title="Safety Is More Than Common Sense" target="_blank">Safety is More Than Common Sense </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://risk-safety.com/is-workplace-safety-merely-common-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Trees Contribute To Buncefield Explosions?</title>
		<link>http://risk-safety.com/did-trees-contribute-to-buncefiled-explosion/</link>
		<comments>http://risk-safety.com/did-trees-contribute-to-buncefiled-explosion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Saraf</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Fires and explosions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Incident Investigation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Process Safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[buncefield accident]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[buncefield bp]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[buncefield explosion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[buncefield fire and explosion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[buncefield incident]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[buncefield report]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[deflagration to detonation transition]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[flame acceleration]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oil explosion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oil fire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://risk-safety.com/did-trees-contribute-to-buncefiled-explosion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, Erik, a reader of this blog directed me to a video his firm has created that explains the role of trees leading to the Buncefield explosion.
Remember the Buncefield incident occurred in oil storage and transport depot. Thus the fuel involved was liquid hydrocarbon. The most probable outcome of a liquid hydrocarbon release is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, Erik, a reader of this blog directed me to a video his firm has created that explains the role of trees leading to the Buncefield explosion.</p>
<p>Remember the Buncefield incident occurred in oil storage and transport depot. Thus the fuel involved was liquid hydrocarbon. The most probable outcome of a liquid hydrocarbon release is a fire&#8230;so it is conceivable that other circumstances such as amount and duration of release and the semi-confinement provided by surroundings may have lead to flame acceleration and increased explosion overpressures.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDVdipBgKSY" title="Buncefield Explosion, GexCon investigation using FLACS " target="_blank">link</a> to the video from Gexcon.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDVdipBgKSY">www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDVdipBgKSY</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://risk-safety.com/did-trees-contribute-to-buncefiled-explosion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Five Risk and Safety Blog Posts for 2009</title>
		<link>http://risk-safety.com/top-five-risk-and-safety-blog-posts-for-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://risk-safety.com/top-five-risk-and-safety-blog-posts-for-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Saraf</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Battery Fires]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fires and explosions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Process Safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Risk Analysis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biodiesel fire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biodiesel safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biofuel safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[process safety blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[QRA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[risk assessment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://risk-safety.com/top-five-risk-and-safety-blog-posts-for-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to wish readers and the growing list of subscribers of risk and safety blog a prosperous 2010.
It has been a year since I started writing the blog. Here are top five blog posts for 2009:
1. Biofuel Safety: Is it time for Bio-PSM?
2. Lithium Battery Fires: Why Your Laptops Can Catch on Fire
3. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to wish readers and the growing list of subscribers of risk and safety blog a prosperous 2010.</p>
<p>It has been a year since I started writing the blog. Here are top five blog posts for 2009:</p>
<p>1. <a href="http://risk-safety.com/biofuel-safety-is-it-time-for-bio-psm/" title="Biofuel Safety: Is it Time for Bio-PSM?" target="_blank">Biofuel Safety: Is it time for Bio-PSM?</a></p>
<p>2. <a href="http://risk-safety.com/lithium-battery-fires-why-your-laptop-can-catch-on-fire/" title="Lithium Battery Fires" target="_blank">Lithium Battery Fires: Why Your Laptops Can Catch on Fire</a></p>
<p>3. <a href="http://risk-safety.com/top-five-challenges-for-process-safety/" title="Top Five Challenges for Process Safety" target="_blank">Top Five Challenges for Process Safety</a></p>
<p>4. <a href="http://risk-safety.com/bleve/" target="_blank" title="BLEVE">BLEVE</a></p>
<p>5. <a href="http://risk-safety.com/quantitative-risk-assessment-will-quantifying-risks-help-you-minimize-them/" title="QRA Quality" target="_blank">Quantitative Risk Assessment: Will Quantifying Risks Help You Minimize Them?</a></p>
<p>I hope readers have found Risk and Safety blog informative and I look forward to continuing this work in the coming here.</p>
<p>If you have any feedback/comments/suggestions for improvement do <a href="http://risk-safety.com/contact/" title="Contact Us" target="_blank">drop</a> me a note.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://risk-safety.com/top-five-risk-and-safety-blog-posts-for-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>History Repeats Itself: Buncefield, Puerto Rico, Jaipur</title>
		<link>http://risk-safety.com/history-repeats-itself-buncefiled-puerto-rico-jaipur/</link>
		<comments>http://risk-safety.com/history-repeats-itself-buncefiled-puerto-rico-jaipur/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Saraf</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical Accidents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fires and explosions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Incident Investigation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Buncefield]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Caribbean Petroleum Corporation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iocl]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iocl fire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[jaipur fire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[oil depot fire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[puerto rico fire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[san juan fire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://risk-safety.com/history-repeats-itself-buncefiled-puerto-rico-jaipur/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In December 2005, fire and explosion at Buncefield oil storage depot injured 40 people. Overfilling of a fuel storage tank (Tank 912) led to release of unleaded gasoline (petrol) which formed a cloud of flammable vapor that subsequently ignited. 
Puerto Rico Fire
Four years after Buncefield, around midnight on October 23, 2009, a major fire was reported at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span">In December 2005, fire and explosion at Buncefield oil storage depot injured 40 people. Overfilling of a fuel storage tank (Tank 912) led to release of unleaded gasoline (petrol) which formed a cloud of flammable vapor that subsequently ignited. </span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"><strong>Puerto Rico Fire</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span">Four years after Buncefield, around midnight on October 23, 2009, a major fire was reported at the Caribbean Petroleum Corporation (CBC) oil depot in San Juan Bay, Puerto Rico. The initial fire destroyed eleven storage tanks at the facility and the fire spread to adjacent tanks. The explosion was heard 5-miles away. The tanks contained jet fuel, oil, and bunker fuel. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span">Click <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/americas/10/23/puerto.rico.explosion/" target="_blank">here</a> for further details on CBC fire and explosion.</span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"><strong>Jaipur Fire</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span">Exactly a week after the San Juan fire on October 29, a fire broke out at Indian Oil Company (IOCL) storage depot in Jaipur, India. Six people have been killed and 150 are reported injured. The fire lasted for around six days and neighboring residents are complaining of health problems. IOCL is facing negligence charges.</span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span">Click <a href="http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/fire_at_oil_depot_in_jaipur_24_injured.php" target="_blank">here</a> for further details on Jaipue fire and explosion.</span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"><strong>Fires in Storage Facilities</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span">It is worth nothing that all the above three major incidents (Buncefield, San Juan, and Jaipur) occurred </span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span">in a matter of four years </span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span">at liquid hydrocarbon storage facilities .</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span"></span><span style="background-color: #ffffff" class="Apple-style-span">Why does history repeat itself&#8230;and in such a short time? </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://risk-safety.com/history-repeats-itself-buncefiled-puerto-rico-jaipur/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
